Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/tech-log-studio/security-and-trust-boundaries/concept/concept-adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03.md
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

43 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown

---
kind: CONCEPT
slug: adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03
title: ObjectReference가 보장하는 route 구획
topic: security-and-trust-boundaries
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
status: 게시 전
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
rootTreeNode: concept:adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
assets:
- key: adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03.svg
evidence:
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03.txt
source:
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/09-adapter-outbound-objectstorage.md#L135 이다.
module: adapter-outbound-objectstorage
---
# ObjectReference가 보장하는 route 구획
`RoutingObjectReadAdapter.load``canonicalText`를 분리한 뒤 두 번째 구획을 직접 읽는다. 별도 인덱스 검사는 없지만 `ObjectReference` 생성자가 `ObjectIdentitySupport.requireRouted(canonicalText, "osr1")`로 형식을 강제하므로, 유효한 참조에는 route 구획이 항상 존재한다.
## 본문
<!-- body:start -->
## 직접 인덱싱과 입력 불변식
`RoutingObjectReadAdapter.load``reference.canonicalText().split("\\.", -1)[1]`로 route token을 읽는다. 이 코드만 보면 두 번째 구획이 없을 때 `ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException`이 발생할 수 있다.
## RoutingObjectReadAdapter 참조 위치
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03" alt="코드베이스에서 RoutingObjectReadAdapter 를 검색한 출력 5줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="RoutingObjectReadAdapter 코드베이스 검색 — 5줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
:::
## ObjectReference가 보장하는 형식
`ObjectReference` 생성자는 `ObjectIdentitySupport.requireRouted(canonicalText, "osr1")`를 통해 routed 형식을 먼저 검증한다. 따라서 정상적으로 생성된 `ObjectReference``load`에 전달되는 경로에서는 두 번째 구획이 값 타입의 불변식으로 보장된다. 현재 계약에서는 이 split 자체를 결함으로 분류할 근거가 없다.
<!-- body:end -->