Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/tech-log-studio/state-machines-and-ownership/concept/concept-adapter-inbound-web-c09.md
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

41 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown

---
kind: CONCEPT
slug: adapter-inbound-web-c09
title: 캐시 헤더를 소유하는 것은 24줄 상수 두 개다
topic: state-machines-and-ownership
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
status: 게시 전
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
rootTreeNode: concept:adapter-inbound-web-c09
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
assets:
- key: adapter-inbound-web-c09
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/adapter-inbound-web-c09.svg
evidence:
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/adapter-inbound-web-c09.txt
source:
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/14-adapter-inbound-web.md#L864 이다.
module: adapter-inbound-web
---
# 캐시 헤더를 소유하는 것은 24줄 상수 두 개다
배선된 `CacheControlFilter``@Component`라 컴포넌트 스캔이 잡고 모든 응답에 `no-store`를 붙인다. 프로파일·지시자·`Vary` 규칙을 갖춘 `cache` 패키지 4파일 310 LOC은 배선되지 않았다.
## 본문
<!-- body:start -->
배선된 쪽은 `CacheControlFilter`다. `@Component`이므로 컴포넌트 스캔이 잡고 Spring이 `Filter` 빈을 체인에 넣는다. **모든 응답에 `no-store`를 붙인다.** 배선되지 않은 것은 `cache` 패키지 4개 파일 310 LOC이고, `web.cache.` 패키지를 참조하는 파일이 자기 패키지 밖에 **0개**다.
## 분석 원문의 두 벌 비교
:::evidence key="adapter-inbound-web-c09" alt="분석 문서 analysis/14-adapter-inbound-web.md 에서 이 기록의 근거 절을 그대로 잘라낸 15줄. 코드베이스를 측정한 것이 아니라 원본 판정이 무엇을 적었는지를 보여 준다." caption="analysis/14-adapter-inbound-web.md 발췌 — 15줄" zoom="true"
:::
## 소유자를 지목하는 주석과 실제 소유자
`SecurityConfig:80`이 Spring Security의 기본 캐시 헤더 작성기를 끄면서 그 이유를 적는다 — "`CacheControlFilter` **owns the cache header policy**". 소유자는 24줄짜리 상수 두 개이고, 프로파일·지시자·`Vary` 규칙을 갖춘 310줄은 소유하지 않는다.
<!-- body:end -->