Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/tech-log-studio/state-machines-and-ownership/concept/concept-messaging-transport-spi-c04.md
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

52 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown

---
kind: CONCEPT
slug: messaging-transport-spi-c04
title: 선언된 종료 순서와 실제 종료 경로
topic: state-machines-and-ownership
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
status: 게시 전
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
rootTreeNode: concept:messaging-transport-spi-c04
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
assets:
- key: messaging-transport-spi-c04
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/messaging-transport-spi-c04.svg
evidence:
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/messaging-transport-spi-c04.txt
source:
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/messaging/messaging-transport-spi.md#L326 이다.
module: messaging-transport-spi
---
# 선언된 종료 순서와 실제 종료 경로
발행·수신·회전·종료 네 경로가 있고, 종료는 실제 경로가 따로 있다.
## 관계
- **멱등 종료를 보장하는 컴포넌트는 종료 이후의 등록도 정의한다**
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
- **같은 개념의 sentinel은 계층을 넘어 하나로 정한다**
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
## 본문
<!-- body:start -->
**발행** — 상위(`DefaultMessagePublisher`)가 `TransportPublishRequest`를 만들어 `MessagingTransport.publish` → 어댑터가 `TransportPublishResult(PublishResult)` 반환.
**수신** — 상위가 `TransportConsumerSpec(profile, sink)``register` → 어댑터가 메시지마다 `sink.apply(TransportDelivery)` → 상위가 `TransportSettlement`으로 정산.
## DefaultMessagePublisher 참조 위치
:::evidence key="messaging-transport-spi-c04" alt="코드베이스에서 DefaultMessagePublisher 를 검색한 출력 22줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="DefaultMessagePublisher 코드베이스 검색 — 22줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
:::
## 회전과 실제 종료 경로
**회전** — 새 `MessagingRuntime` 생성 → `registry.install(runtime, now)` → 옛 세대 `retire` → lease가 0이면 즉시 close, 아니면 `draining`에 적재 → 스케줄러가 `closeExpiredDraining(now)` 호출.
**종료(실제 경로)**`MessagingShutdownLifecycle.stop()``admission.stopAcceptingNewWork()``drain.beginDrain(now)` → 50 ms 폴링으로 `isDrained` 대기 → 마감 도달 시 중단.
<!-- body:end -->