The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
32 lines
1.6 KiB
Java
32 lines
1.6 KiB
Java
package dev.caskeleton.adapter.outbound.persistence.postgresql.error;
|
|
|
|
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
|
|
|
|
import dev.caskeleton.adapter.outbound.persistence.api.PersistenceOperationName;
|
|
import dev.caskeleton.adapter.outbound.persistence.api.error.ConstraintCode;
|
|
import dev.caskeleton.adapter.outbound.persistence.api.transaction.RetryProfile;
|
|
import dev.caskeleton.adapter.outbound.persistence.api.transaction.TransactionAttempt;
|
|
import dev.caskeleton.adapter.outbound.persistence.transaction.DefaultJpaRetryPolicy;
|
|
import java.sql.SQLException;
|
|
import java.time.Duration;
|
|
import java.time.Instant;
|
|
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
|
|
|
|
class PostgreSql40003PolicyProbeTest {
|
|
@Test
|
|
void currentTranslatorDemotes40003BeforeRetryPolicy() {
|
|
var translator = PostgreSqlExceptionTranslator.with(name -> new ConstraintCode("unknown.constraint"));
|
|
var translated = translator.translate(
|
|
new SQLException("completion unknown", "40003"),
|
|
new PersistenceOperationName("probe.40003"), 1, Duration.ZERO, "trace-probe");
|
|
var decision = DefaultJpaRetryPolicy.forProfile(
|
|
RetryProfile.boundedContention("probe-default", 3))
|
|
.classify(translated, TransactionAttempt.first(Instant.EPOCH));
|
|
System.out.println("translated.category=" + translated.category());
|
|
System.out.println("translated.completionUnknown=" + translated.completionUnknown());
|
|
System.out.println("decision.disposition=" + decision.disposition());
|
|
System.out.println("decision.reason=" + decision.reason());
|
|
assertThat(decision.disposition().name()).isEqualTo("FAIL");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|