Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/tech-log-studio/delivery-and-settlement-models/concept/concept-messaging-policy-c07.md
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

53 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown

---
kind: CONCEPT
slug: messaging-policy-c07
title: 발행 경로는 프로덕션에서 실제로 조립된다
topic: delivery-and-settlement-models
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
status: 게시 전
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
rootTreeNode: concept:messaging-policy-c07
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
assets:
- key: messaging-policy-c07
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/messaging-policy-c07.svg
evidence:
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/messaging-policy-c07.txt
source:
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/messaging/messaging-policy.md#L603 이다.
module: messaging-policy
---
# 발행 경로는 프로덕션에서 실제로 조립된다
DefaultMessagePublisher MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:446 TransportMessagingRuntime MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:476 DefaultRetryDecisionEngine MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:168 DeadLetterOrchestrator MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:180
## 관계
- **구성 오류는 한 예외 타입과 안정 코드로 보고한다**
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
- **저장소 밖 문서를 절 번호로 인용하지 않는다**
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
- **부팅 경로의 알고리즘 복잡도는 문서화한다**
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
## 본문
<!-- body:start -->
네 타입이 프로덕션 auto-configuration 안에서 생성된다.
| 타입 | 생성 지점 |
|---|---|
| `DefaultMessagePublisher` | `MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:446` |
| `TransportMessagingRuntime` | `MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:476` |
| `DefaultRetryDecisionEngine` | `MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:168` |
| `DeadLetterOrchestrator` | `MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:180` |
## 이 기록이 다루는 범위
:::evidence key="messaging-policy-c07" alt="코드베이스에서 파일 목록을 만든 출력 25줄. 이 기록이 다루는 범위가 그 목록이다." caption="코드베이스 파일 목록 — 25줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
:::
<!-- body:end -->