DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
41 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: app-bootstrap-c04
|
|
title: 자동설정 안의 @ConditionalOnBean은 컴포넌트 스캔과 다르다
|
|
topic: identity-and-value-contracts
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:app-bootstrap-c04
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: app-bootstrap-c04
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/app-bootstrap-c04.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/app-bootstrap-c04.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/18-app-bootstrap.md#L386 이다.
|
|
module: app-bootstrap
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 자동설정 안의 @ConditionalOnBean은 컴포넌트 스캔과 다르다
|
|
|
|
7개 main 파일 전부 `@Configuration`이고 `@ConditionalOnProperty`/`@ConditionalOnBean`으로 게이트된다. 자동설정 안에서의 `@ConditionalOnBean`은 Boot가 평가 순서를 통제하므로 모듈 14 §7.1이 경고한 위험이 없다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
7개 main 파일 전부 `@Configuration`이고 `@ConditionalOnProperty`/`@ConditionalOnBean`으로 게이트된다.
|
|
|
|
## 세 조건을 함께 쓰는 자리
|
|
|
|
`MongoPlatformHealthConfig`가 `@ConditionalOnBean` + `@ConditionalOnMissingBean` + `@ConditionalOnProperty` 셋을 함께 쓰는데, 자동설정 안에서의 `@ConditionalOnBean`은 Boot가 평가 순서를 통제하므로 모듈 14 §7.1이 경고한 컴포넌트 스캔 상의 위험이 없다.
|
|
|
|
## MongoPlatformHealthConfig 참조 위치
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="app-bootstrap-c04" alt="코드베이스에서 MongoPlatformHealthConfig 를 검색한 출력 1줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="MongoPlatformHealthConfig 코드베이스 검색 — 1줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|