DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
45 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
45 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: adapter-outbound-httpclient-c03
|
|
title: 검사할 수 없는 성분을 가진 본문은 재생 가능으로 인증되지 않는다
|
|
topic: schema-and-wire-models
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:adapter-outbound-httpclient-c03
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: adapter-outbound-httpclient-c03
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/adapter-outbound-httpclient-c03.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/adapter-outbound-httpclient-c03.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/11-adapter-outbound-httpclient.md#L237 이다.
|
|
module: adapter-outbound-httpclient
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 검사할 수 없는 성분을 가진 본문은 재생 가능으로 인증되지 않는다
|
|
|
|
`ObjectBody`의 재생 가능성은 값의 성질로 구조적으로 판정되고, 판정할 수 없으면 `ONE_SHOT`으로 떨어진다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
이 sub-scope에서 가장 신중한 코드다. 과거 동작과 그 결과가 적혀 있다.
|
|
|
|
## ObjectBody 참조 위치
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-httpclient-c03" alt="코드베이스에서 ObjectBody 를 검색한 출력 29줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="ObjectBody 코드베이스 검색 — 29줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
## 값의 성질로 판정한다
|
|
|
|
지금은 `deeplyImmutable(value)`가 구조적으로 판정한다 — 문자열·숫자·불리언·문자·enum·UUID·`Temporal`은 통과, 컬렉션과 맵은 **JDK의 불변 뷰인지 이름으로 확인**하고 원소까지 재귀, record는 모든 성분을 반사로 재귀 확인, 그 외는 전부 `ONE_SHOT`.
|
|
|
|
## 인증할 수 없으면 재생하지 않는다
|
|
|
|
반사가 실패하면 "A component the platform cannot inspect cannot be certified, and an uncertified body is one-shot rather than optimistically replayable." 컬렉션 판정이 이름 기반인 이유도 적혀 있다 — "`List.of(...)` and `Collections.unmodifiableList(...)` return package-private classes with no shared marker interface. An ordinary `ArrayList` the caller still holds is exactly the case this must not accept." test 넷이 네 갈래를 고정한다 — `anImmutableRecordReplays`, `aMutableValueIsOneShot`, `aRecordWrappingMutableStateIsOneShot`, `anArbitraryBeanIsOneShot`.
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|