Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/tech-log-studio/state-machines-and-ownership/concept/concept-adapter-inbound-websocket-c05.md
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

37 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown

---
kind: CONCEPT
slug: adapter-inbound-websocket-c05
title: 릴리스 시점 도구라서 런타임 미배선이 정상이다
topic: state-machines-and-ownership
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
status: 게시 전
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
rootTreeNode: concept:adapter-inbound-websocket-c05
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
assets:
- key: adapter-inbound-websocket-c05
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/adapter-inbound-websocket-c05.svg
evidence:
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/adapter-inbound-websocket-c05.txt
source:
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/17-adapter-inbound-websocket.md#L420 이다.
module: adapter-inbound-websocket
---
# 릴리스 시점 도구라서 런타임 미배선이 정상이다
`advanced/release/AdvancedPromotionGate`(120)와 `release/WebSocketStableReleaseGate`(106)가 각각 Advanced 승격과 Stable 릴리스를 판정한다. 둘 다 main 참조 0이고 테스트만 있다.
## 본문
<!-- body:start -->
`advanced/release/AdvancedPromotionGate`(120)와 `release/WebSocketStableReleaseGate`(106, §11)가 각각 Advanced 승격과 Stable 릴리스를 판정한다. 둘 다 main 참조 0이고 테스트만 있다 — 릴리스 시점 도구이므로 런타임 미배선이 정상이다.
## 분석 원문의 판정
:::evidence key="adapter-inbound-websocket-c05" alt="분석 문서 analysis/17-adapter-inbound-websocket.md 에서 이 기록의 근거 절을 그대로 잘라낸 15줄. 코드베이스를 측정한 것이 아니라 원본 판정이 무엇을 적었는지를 보여 준다." caption="analysis/17-adapter-inbound-websocket.md 발췌 — 15줄" zoom="true"
:::
<!-- body:end -->