The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
52 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
52 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: adapter-outbound-cache-redis-c01
|
|
title: 꺼져 있을 때 아무것도 기여하지 않는다는 말이 문자 그대로다
|
|
topic: composition-and-lifecycle-models
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:adapter-outbound-cache-redis-c01
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: adapter-outbound-cache-redis-c01
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/adapter-outbound-cache-redis-c01.svg
|
|
- key: adapter-outbound-cache-redis-c01-diagram
|
|
file: ../../../final/assets/diagrams/adapter-outbound-cache-redis-c01.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/adapter-outbound-cache-redis-c01.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/10-adapter-outbound-cache-redis.md#L85 이다.
|
|
module: adapter-outbound-cache-redis
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 꺼져 있을 때 아무것도 기여하지 않는다는 말이 문자 그대로다
|
|
|
|
`RedisSdkSettings`가 애플리케이션 전역 `@ConfigurationPropertiesScan`이 아니라 `RedisSdkAutoConfiguration`의 `@Bean`으로만 존재한다. 그래서 스위치가 꺼져 있으면 속성이 묶이지도 않는다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
`RedisSdkAutoConfiguration`의 javadoc이 규칙을 적는다.
|
|
|
|
> "`app.redis.enabled` is the whole switch. While it is false this class contributes nothing, and because `RedisSdkSettings` is registered here rather than by the application-wide `@ConfigurationPropertiesScan`, **'contributes nothing' is literal**: the properties are not bound, the cross-field rules are not run, no credential is resolved, and no policy resource, TLS material, client, connection or thread is created."
|
|
|
|
## 조립이 고정된 순서
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-cache-redis-c01-diagram" alt="설정 바인딩과 교차 필드 검증과 클라이언트 생성이 왼쪽에서 오른쪽으로 이어지고 화살표에 bound settings 와 검증 통과가 붙은 구조" caption="조립이 고정된 순서" zoom="false"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
`RedisSdkSettings`는 `@ConfigurationPropertiesScan` 대상이 아니라 이 클래스의 `@Bean` + `@ConfigurationProperties`로만 존재한다. 그래서 Redis를 쓰지 않는 배포는 Redis 설정을 들고 다니지 않고, **켠 적 없는 잘못된 Redis 설정 때문에 벌을 받지도 않는다**. test가 그 넷을 이름으로 고정한다 — `absentSwitchRegistersNothing`, `disabledRegistersNothing`, `disabledIgnoresMalformedRedisConfiguration`, `disabledNeverAsksForASecretOrAConnection`.
|
|
|
|
## RedisSdkAutoConfiguration 참조 위치
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-cache-redis-c01" alt="코드베이스에서 RedisSdkAutoConfiguration 를 검색한 출력 30줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="RedisSdkAutoConfiguration 코드베이스 검색 — 30줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
## 검증이 bean factory 메서드 안에 있는 이유
|
|
|
|
순서도 bind → validate → build로 고정된다. 검증이 `@PostConstruct`나 리스너가 아니라 **bean factory 메서드 안**에 있어서, 설정 오류가 "그 bean을 만들지 못했다"는 실패로 보고되고 그 아래 어떤 것도 검증되지 않은 settings를 잡을 수 없다. 그리고 `redisSdkSettingsValidation`이 별도 bean인 이유도 적혀 있다 — Spring은 factory 메서드가 **반환한 뒤에** binder를 돌리므로 검증이 `redisSdkSettings()` 안에 있을 수 없다.
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|