DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.8 KiB
1.8 KiB
kind, slug, title, topic, project, status, sourceRevision, rootTreeNode, evidenceCapturedOn, assets, evidence, source, module
| kind | slug | title | topic | project | status | sourceRevision | rootTreeNode | evidenceCapturedOn | assets | evidence | source | module | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONCEPT | messaging-rabbit-c01 | 소비·정착·죽은 편지의 세 규율 | delivery-and-settlement-models | clean-architecture-backend-template | 게시 전 | 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916 | concept:messaging-rabbit-c01 | 2026-09-01 |
|
|
|
messaging-rabbit |
소비·정착·죽은 편지의 세 규율
좁은 catch. RabbitConsumerRegistrar.onMessage 가 디코딩만 감싸는 안쪽 try 를 따로 둔다.
본문
좁은 catch. RabbitConsumerRegistrar.onMessage 가 디코딩만 감싸는 안쪽 try 를 따로 둔다.
핸들러가 끝난 뒤의 두 갈래
:::evidence key="messaging-rabbit-c01-diagram" alt="핸들러 완료에서 정착함 ack 와 정착 안 함 requeue 두 갈래가 나온다" caption="핸들러가 끝난 뒤의 두 갈래" zoom="false" :::
정착하지 않은 핸들러. 완료했는데 정착하지 않으면 대신 ack 하지 않고 requeue 한다 — "acknowledging on its behalf would silently drop it".
RabbitConsumerRegistrar 참조 위치
:::evidence key="messaging-rabbit-c01" alt="코드베이스에서 RabbitConsumerRegistrar 를 검색한 출력 13줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="RabbitConsumerRegistrar 코드베이스 검색 — 13줄 · exit 0" zoom="true" :::
네이티브 죽은 편지
RabbitNativeDeadLetterCapability 가 두 조건을 모두 요구한다.