DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
44 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: messaging-schema-json-c04
|
|
title: 디코딩은 등록 클래스와 정확히 같은지를 본다
|
|
topic: schema-and-wire-models
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:messaging-schema-json-c04
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: messaging-schema-json-c04
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/messaging-schema-json-c04.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/messaging-schema-json-c04.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/messaging/messaging-schema-json.md#L238 이다.
|
|
module: messaging-schema-json
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 디코딩은 등록 클래스와 정확히 같은지를 본다
|
|
|
|
encode: requireRegistered(type, version) → payload가 등록 타입의 인스턴스인지 → BoundedByteSink 생성 → mapper.writeValue(sink, payload) → 실패 시 unwrapTooLarge → EncodedMessage(bytes, JSON, SchemaReference) decode: requireRegistered(type, version) → 요청 클래스가 등록 클래스와 정확히 같은지 → encoded.length 상한 → mapper.readValue → JacksonException이면 JSON_DECODE_FAILED
|
|
|
|
## 관계
|
|
|
|
- **실패 코드는 운영자의 다음 행동이 갈리는 지점마다 나눈다**
|
|
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
**encode:** `requireRegistered(type, version)` → payload가 등록 타입의 인스턴스인지 → `BoundedByteSink` 생성 → `mapper.writeValue(sink, payload)` → 실패 시 `unwrapTooLarge` → `EncodedMessage(bytes, JSON, SchemaReference)`
|
|
|
|
**decode:** `requireRegistered(type, version)` → 요청 클래스가 등록 클래스와 정확히 같은지 → `encoded.length` 상한 → `mapper.readValue` → `JacksonException`이면 `JSON_DECODE_FAILED`
|
|
|
|
## BoundedByteSink 참조 위치
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="messaging-schema-json-c04" alt="코드베이스에서 BoundedByteSink 를 검색한 출력 15줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="BoundedByteSink 코드베이스 검색 — 15줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|