DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
31 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
31 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
# evidence 247 — messaging-capability-flag-enforcement-census
|
|
# revision: a24ece9cf797f7ea647e33bf846b115208ed1ba5
|
|
# cwd: /shared/codebase/clean-architecture-backend-template/src/messaging
|
|
# command: bash /tmp/cap.sh
|
|
# ---- raw output ----
|
|
brokerAcknowledgement main=0 test=1
|
|
replicationOrPersistenceEvidence main=0 test=0
|
|
perMessageSettlement main=0 test=1
|
|
batchSettlement main=0 test=0
|
|
orderedStream main=5 test=1
|
|
keyedOrdering main=0 test=3
|
|
replay main=0 test=2
|
|
delayedDelivery main=1 test=0
|
|
brokerTransaction main=0 test=3
|
|
deduplicatedPublish main=1 test=1
|
|
nativeDeadLetter main=0 test=1
|
|
topologyManagement main=0 test=0
|
|
|
|
---- main-code call sites ----
|
|
messaging-policy/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/messaging/policy/DefaultRetryDecisionEngine.java:49: && context.capabilities().orderedStream()) {
|
|
messaging-spring-boot-starter/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/messaging/autoconfigure/KafkaMessagingAutoConfiguration.java:62: compiled.kafkaBrokers().stream(), profiles.orderedStream())
|
|
messaging-spring-boot-starter/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/messaging/autoconfigure/MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:132: java.util.stream.Stream.concat(compiled.destinations().stream(), profiles.orderedStream())
|
|
messaging-spring-boot-starter/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/messaging/autoconfigure/MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration.java:223: java.util.stream.Stream.concat(compiled.security().stream(), profiles.orderedStream())
|
|
messaging-spring-boot-starter/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/messaging/autoconfigure/RabbitMessagingAutoConfiguration.java:58: compiled.rabbitBrokers().stream(), profiles.orderedStream())
|
|
messaging-policy/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/messaging/policy/DefaultRetryDecisionEngine.java:64: if (policy.mode() == RetryMode.BROKER_DELAYED && context.capabilities().delayedDelivery()) {
|
|
messaging-runtime-core/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/messaging/runtime/DefaultMessagePublisher.java:250: && !transport.capabilities(profile.name()).capabilities().deduplicatedPublish()) {
|
|
|
|
---- NOTE ----
|
|
ObjectProvider.orderedStream() (Spring API) is a name collision with the orderedStream capability flag.
|
|
The four hits in messaging-spring-boot-starter are ObjectProvider.orderedStream(), not the flag.
|