DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
24 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
24 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
# 능력 성분 순서 — 여덟째
|
|
32: boolean delayedDelivery,
|
|
# Rabbit 이 넘기는 열두 값 (여덟째가 참)
|
|
new MessagingCapabilities(
|
|
true, true, true, false, false, false, false, true, false, false, true, true);
|
|
^^^^ delayedDelivery
|
|
|
|
# 이 플래그를 읽는 엔진과 그 조립 지점
|
|
64: if (policy.mode() == RetryMode.BROKER_DELAYED && context.capabilities().delayedDelivery()) {
|
|
167: public RetryDecisionEngine retryDecisionEngine() {
|
|
168- return new DefaultRetryDecisionEngine(new BackoffCalculator());
|
|
169- }
|
|
|
|
# 그 결정의 유일한 production 소비자와 delay 처리
|
|
if (decision instanceof RetryDecision.PublishToRetryDestination publish) {
|
|
return retryPublisher
|
|
.publish(publish.destination(), delivery, failure, now)
|
|
|
|
# 지연 큐를 기술하는 타입을 참조하는 파일
|
|
./messaging/messaging-rabbit/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/messaging/rabbit/RabbitSettlementControllerTest.java
|
|
./messaging/messaging-rabbit/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/messaging/rabbit/RabbitRetryQueueTopology.java
|
|
|
|
# 큐를 선언하는 코드 (AmqpAdmin/declareQueue/QueueBuilder) 매치: 0
|