DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
16 lines
651 B
Plaintext
16 lines
651 B
Plaintext
### 17.4 P3 — 프로파일 검증기가 javadoc 이 든 두 실수 중 하나만 검사한다
|
|
|
|
javadoc:
|
|
|
|
> "Two in particular. Round-robin over a target that resolves to one address … and **two profiles
|
|
> pointing at the same target with the same settings are one channel with two names**, which is the
|
|
> shape that appears when somebody wanted a different SLO and copied the profile instead."
|
|
|
|
구현된 것은 첫째와 **다른 것**이다.
|
|
|
|
```java
|
|
String previous = seenNames.putIfAbsent(profileName, profile.target().toString());
|
|
if (previous != null) { violations.add("channel profile '…' is declared twice, for '…' and '…'"); }
|
|
```
|
|
|