donghyeon.kang/document-haness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
fc2366087117efb0acff4bbd2e4c3d684fa7253f
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/final/evidence/rendered/messaging-outbox-jdbc-postgresql-f05.svg
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project 
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

31 lines
6.1 KiB
XML
Raw Blame History

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="1200" height="678" viewBox="0 0 1200 678" role="img">
<title>terminal evidence</title>
<desc>Terminal-style rendering generated from retained command output. Sensitive-looking values are redacted in the visual asset.</desc>
<rect x="1" y="1" width="1198" height="676" rx="14" fill="#0d1117" stroke="#30363d"/>
<rect x="1" y="1" width="1198" height="44" rx="14" fill="#161b22"/>
<rect x="1" y="30" width="1198" height="14" fill="#161b22"/>
<circle cx="24" cy="22" r="6" fill="#ff5f57"/>
<circle cx="44" cy="22" r="6" fill="#febc2e"/>
<circle cx="64" cy="22" r="6" fill="#28c840"/>
<text x="92" y="27" fill="#8b949e" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace">terminal evidence</text>
<text x="24" y="68" fill="#c9d1d9" font-size="15" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">$ sed -n &#x27;917,931p&#x27; analysis/messaging/messaging-outbox-jdbc-postgresql.md</tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="90" fill="#8b949e" font-size="13" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">cwd: /shared/document-detail/clean-architecture-backend-template</tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="112" fill="#8b949e" font-size="13" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">time: 2026-09-01T05:42:34+00:00 · exit 0</tspan></text>
<line x1="24" y1="126" x2="1176" y2="126" stroke="#30363d"/>
<text x="24" y="166" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">### P3 — 구세대 전이 메서드가 신세대와 다른 행 상태를 남긴다</tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="188" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0"></tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="210" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">`markPublished(MessageId, Instant)` 는 `lease_owner` 와 `next_attempt_at` 을 지우지 않는다. `markPublished(OutboxLease, Instant)</tspan><tspan x="24" dy="22">` 는 지운다. `markAmbiguous`/`markFailed` 도 같다. 두 컬럼은 청구 술어와 부분 인덱스가 읽는 값이다.</tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="254" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0"></tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="276" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">이 저장소에 구세대를 부르는 프로덕션 코드는 없다. 그러나 포트에 남아 있고 `@Deprecated` 도 아니므로, 외부 구현이나 향후 코드가 </tspan><tspan x="24" dy="22">부를 수 있다. 최소한 `@Deprecated` 와 &quot;신세대를 쓰라&quot;는 문장이 필요하고, 더 나은 것은 제거다.</tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="320" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0"></tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="342" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">### P3 — 백오프 지터가 인스턴스를 분산시키지 못한다</tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="364" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0"></tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="386" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">`jittered = capped - (capped/8) * (exponent % 3)` 는 `exponent` 만의 함수다. 같은 상태의 복제본들은 같은 값을 계산한다. javadoc </tspan><tspan x="24" dy="22">이 약속하는 &quot;thundering herd 방지&quot; 가 성립하지 않는다.</tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="430" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0"></tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="452" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">`OutboxRelay` 가 이미 `defaultOwner()` 로 프로세스별 안정 식별자를 만든다(`pid@uuid8`). 그것의 해시를 지터에 섞으면 결정성(같은 </tspan><tspan x="24" dy="22">프로세스에서 재현 가능)을 유지하면서 인스턴스 간 위상차가 생긴다. javadoc 이 난수를 거부한 이유(&quot;a random source would make the </tspan><tspan x="24" dy="22">schedule impossible to test&quot;)도 그대로 지켜진다.</tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="518" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0"></tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="540" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">### P3 — 커넥션 획득 방식이 리프 안에서 갈린다</tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="562" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0"></tspan></text>
<text x="24" y="584" fill="#e6edf3" font-size="14" font-family="ui-monospace, SFMono-Regular, Menlo, Consolas, monospace" xml:space="preserve"><tspan x="24" dy="0">`JdbcOutboxRepository.append` 는 `DataSourceUtils`, 나머지는 raw `dataSource.getConnection()`, `JdbcAdminOperationJournal` 은 전</tspan><tspan x="24" dy="22">부 `DataSourceUtils`. 릴레이 연산이 비즈니스 트랜잭션에 합류하면 안 된다는 판단은 타당하지만 어디에도 적혀 있지 않고, 같은 리프</tspan><tspan x="24" dy="22">의 저널이 반대로 한다.</tspan></text>
</svg>
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink