The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
15 lines
2.3 KiB
JSON
15 lines
2.3 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"assetKey": "a07-f006-claude",
|
|
"kind": "terminal",
|
|
"command": "L=src/adapter/outbound/identifier\nA=src/app-bootstrap/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/bootstrap/architecture/CleanArchitectureTest.java\n\necho '# 지침 문서의 금지 절과 첫 항목에 붙은 근거 둘'\nsed -n '35,41p' $L/CLAUDE.md\n\necho\necho '# 아키텍처 규칙 쪽 — 선언과 그것이 막는 이름들'\nsed -n '1288,1305p' $A\n\necho\necho '# 그 규칙이 실제로 도는가'\ngrep -n '@AnalyzeClasses' $A | sed 's/^/ /'\ngrep -n \"implementation project(':adapter:outbound:identifier')\" src/app-bootstrap/build.gradle | sed 's/^/ /'\ngrep -n './gradlew check' .github/workflows/ci-quality-gates.yml | head -1 | sed 's/^/ /'\n\necho\necho '# 그 리프의 프로덕션 클래스패스'\ngrep -n '^empty=' $L/gradle.lockfile | sed 's/^/ /'\n\necho\necho '# 훅 쪽 — 그 파일이 있다는 자리'\necho -n '# git ls-files .claude : '\ngit ls-files .claude | wc -l\necho -n '# 전 이력에서 .claude 아래 추적된 적 : '\ngit log --all --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u | grep '^\\.claude' | wc -l\necho -n '# 작업 트리 : '\nls -A .claude | tr '\\n' ' '; echo\ngit check-ignore -v .claude/hooks/ca_import_gate.py | sed 's/^/ /'\n\necho\necho '# 문서가 특정한 규칙 번호가 해석되는가'\ngrep -rnI '\\bG4\\b' --exclude-dir=.git --exclude-dir=build --exclude-dir=.gradle . 2>/dev/null \\\n | grep -iv graphql | sed 's#^\\./# #'\n\necho\necho '# 그 훅을 고치겠다던 계획의 현재 상태'\nsed -n '1,3p' docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-20-harness-policy-engine.md\necho '# 그것을 대체한 문서의 목표'\ngrep -n -A1 '^\\*\\*Goal:\\*\\*' docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-25-harness-free-mode-b-amendment.md | head -3\necho -n '# 그 계획이 새로 만들겠다던 디렉터리 : '\n[ -d .harness ] && echo 있음 || echo 없음",
|
|
"cwd": "/shared/codebase/clean-architecture-backend-template",
|
|
"exitCode": 0,
|
|
"executedAt": "2026-09-02T09:52:56+00:00",
|
|
"sourceRevision": "21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916",
|
|
"raw": "evidence/raw/a07-f006-claude.txt",
|
|
"svg": "evidence/rendered/a07-f006-claude.svg",
|
|
"rawSha256": "f329c639cbd773bf02457383ab16c38868ba4905c6c768e9b3fbeeb52e26e772",
|
|
"lines": 54,
|
|
"redaction": "none — 코드베이스 정적 검색"
|
|
}
|