The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
52 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
52 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: adapter-outbound-support-c01
|
|
title: 허용된 의존과 실제 의존이 다르다
|
|
topic: composition-and-lifecycle-models
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:adapter-outbound-support-c01
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: adapter-outbound-support-c01
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/adapter-outbound-support-c01.svg
|
|
- key: adapter-outbound-support-c01-diagram
|
|
file: ../../../final/assets/diagrams/adapter-outbound-support-c01.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/adapter-outbound-support-c01.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/04-adapter-outbound-support.md#L52 이다.
|
|
module: adapter-outbound-support
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 허용된 의존과 실제 의존이 다르다
|
|
|
|
`adapter-outbound-support`의 프로덕션 표면은 타입 셋뿐이다. 레지스트리가 허용하는 project dependency는 셋이지만 실제 project dependency는 0개다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
`adapter-outbound-support`는 application port를 구현하는 하나의 기술 adapter라기보다 **여러 outbound adapter가 공유할 수 있는 기술적 보조 seam**이다.
|
|
|
|
## 이 리프의 프로덕션 표면
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-support-c01-diagram" alt="리프 경계 안에 상관 식별자 조회와 fail-open 로거와 기본 bean 설정 세 상자가 나란히 들어 있는 구조" caption="이 리프의 프로덕션 표면" zoom="false"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
`OutboundCorrelation`은 SLF4J MDC에서 `correlation_id`를 조회하고 값이 없거나 blank면 `"unknown"`을 반환한다. `FailOpenDependencyLogger`는 optional/fail-open outbound 호출의 success/failure observation을 공통 포맷으로 기록한다 — success는 DEBUG, failure는 WARN이다. `OutboundSupportConfig`는 `FailOpenDependencyLogger` default bean을 제공하고, `@ConditionalOnMissingBean`으로 fork/application이 같은 타입을 override할 수 있게 한다.
|
|
|
|
## OutboundCorrelation 참조 위치
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-support-c01" alt="코드베이스에서 OutboundCorrelation 를 검색한 출력 15줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="OutboundCorrelation 코드베이스 검색 — 15줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
## 허용된 의존과 실제 의존
|
|
|
|
`src/config/architecture/modules.json`은 support leaf가 `domain-core`·`application-core`·`shared-contract`를 project dependency로 **허용**한다. 그러나 현재 `build.gradle`과 fresh `compileClasspath` 결과를 보면 실제 project dependency는 **0개**이고, 실제 compile dependency는 `spring-boot-autoconfigure` 4.0.8과 `slf4j-api` 2.0.18뿐이다.
|
|
|
|
즉 registry의 `allowed_dependencies`는 가능한 최대 경계를 나타내고, 현재 source graph가 그 edge를 모두 사용한다는 뜻이 아니다. support는 현 snapshot에서 domain/application/shared 타입과도 결합하지 않는다.
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|